Confirmation Bias
Information before and after entry
Confirmation bias can concern source selection, chart interpretation and memory. The same news may receive considerable weight when it fits a thesis and be ignored when it challenges it. Not every opposing opinion is correct; evidence quality and consistent assessment criteria matter more than simply collecting contrary views.
Record a falsification condition
Before deciding, state the supporting argument, strongest counterargument and observation that would alter the assessment. After entry, evaluate both sides using the same rules. A justified update after new information differs from finding an excuse to breach a stop or exposure limit. Record changes rather than silently rewriting the original thesis.
Review contemporaneous records
Compare the pre-trade note with later interpretation. Look for deleted contrary information, changing definitions and selection of only successful examples. A single event does not establish someone’s character. A procedure can constrain selective interpretation but guarantees neither a correct scenario nor freedom from errors.