CLS (Continuous Linked Settlement)
What PvP provides
Payment-versus-payment links payment finality and eliminates the risk of losing paid principal because only one leg is delivered within that mechanism. Agreeing a rate and instructing a payment do not by themselves establish such settlement. CLSSettlement uses PvP for eligible transactions.
Access conditions and remaining risks
Establish currency and product eligibility and whether participation is direct or indirect. Continue to assess liquidity needs, operational risk and transaction replacement cost. PvP and a central counterparty, or CCP, perform different functions. CLS is not a compensation scheme for a CFD broker’s clients.
Source and related concept
Reference: BIS: FX settlement risk and PvP. Checked 11 October 2026. See FX settlement risk and value date.
Netting and contingent payment
Reducing many obligations to smaller net amounts can lower cash needs, while PvP controls the conditional finality of the two currency payments. Both mechanisms can be present without being interchangeable. Verify the actual method for the covered transaction rather than infer it solely from a counterparty’s name.
FAQ
Is PvP the same as netting?
No. Netting reduces payment amounts; PvP links final payments conditionally. A system may use both functions.
Does CLS protect a CFD account balance?
It is neither negative balance protection, client-money segregation nor a compensation fund. It concerns specific currency-settlement infrastructure.